Register for a no ad experience.
View page demo top advertising
Cat
8 months ago

Two of the worse people

At least he was getting rid of his misogyny. Obviously we are all individuals and these people only speak for themselves but we had to take a inquisitive look at this, is cheating on your boyfriend good? We found out it is but only if you're an asshole. For assholes it seems to just be great and dandy so we compiled a list of why cheating on your boyfriend is a good thing but only if you're an asshole :

"The Relationship Roulette:" Cheating on your boyfriend adds an element of excitement and unpredictability to your relationship, turning it into a high-stakes game of emotional roulette. Who needs trust and stability when you can have betrayal and drama? (This is only a good thing if you're an asshole.)

"The Selfish Satisfaction:" Cheating on your boyfriend is a selfish act, and that's exactly why it's so satisfying. It's like indulging in a guilty pleasure, knowing full well that you're being a total jerk—and reveling in it anyway. (This is only a good thing if you're an asshole.)

"The Ego-Boosting Elixir:" Cheating on your boyfriend is a surefire way to boost your ego and inflate your sense of self-importance. After all, what better way to stroke your own ego than by breaking someone else's heart? (This is only a good thing if you're an asshole.)

"The Drama Queen Drama:" Cheating on your boyfriend is like starring in your own personal soap opera, complete with scandalous plot twists and over-the-top melodrama. It's like living out your wildest fantasies of betrayal and deceit—minus the happy ending, of course. (This is only a good thing if you're an asshole.)

"The Asshole Advantage:" Cheating on your boyfriend is a good thing if you're an asshole because it allows you to fully embrace your inner jerk. It's like wearing your assholery as a badge of honor, proudly displaying your complete disregard for other people's feelings. (This is only a good thing if you're an asshole.)

disclaimer

disclaimer

Share: